Dear Sir / Madam,
Thank you very much for very professional preparation of documents for my
Case which I received on Feb 22/ 2011.
Amongst I received and reviewed FILE PROVIDED BY WSiB (volume 1& 2) and I am
shocked to see how "fatally flawed" was investigative /adjudicative process
conducted by WSiB.
Simply it is not possible to logically follow the pathway taken by the
WSiB provided Fragmented / selected / ILLEGITIMATE / not readable copies of
Documents / Reports, arranged in illogical manner.
*Most of my correspondence to WSiB is missing.
*My letters included in the File are decimated.
*Sentences from Doctor's Reports are "cut /paste" by Adjudicator (s) out of
context in order to negatively impact my Case.
*Adjudicator's conclusions portrait me as an uncooperative / difficult,
some haw fraudulent Complainant while not indicating facts, that I was / am
very sick / not mobile and I was constantly miss guided, purposely confused
/ run around , patronized. I was defrauded by Adjudicators giving me
contradicting requests / orders in order to exhaust me / my resources and
derail my Claim.
*I was ordered to obtain Employment and CPP Records from Government on my
own other wise I was accused of non cooperation. It was for me a long and
Then while I got it, Adjudicator refused to honor them under pretense that
WSiB has to obtain all Records on its own because it must be from unbiased
*Next time Adjudicator requested /ordered me to obtain by my self Medical
Records from the Hospital.
Again I had to struggle to get in to Hospital, pay Fee and send it to
Adjudicator (WSiB). Again it was a long and painful process because of my
medical disabling conditions / financial situation.
After that again, Adjudicator informed me, that she (WSiB) MUST GET THOSE
RECORDS INDEPENDENTLY IN UNBIAS MANNER. Again it takes months to get that
request fulfilled etc.
In such manner WSiB was dealing with every thing involving my Claim.
*WSiB included in forwarded to you File old Reports from my Doctors which
I apparently did "alter" by removing Doctors names in order to protect them
from WSiB's harassment, instead of attaching not "altered" replacement (
full set of Reports) which I promptly re - send on Adjudicator's request.
*WSiB purged my File out of Dr. JeeJeebhoy's (cardiologist) statement
"NUMBER OF TIMES HE TRIED TO SAY TO ME, THAT HIS MEDICAL CONDITIONS ARE WORK
RELATED, BUT I REFUSED TO BELIVE HIM"! - and she started to treat me for
illusionally condition which I did not have and as result of her activity I
did end up on ER in the Hospital!
*Also WSiB / Adjudicators did conceal / not take for consideration
Dermatologist's letter send directly to WSiB INDICATEING / CONFORMING MY
"VITILIGO "AS AN OCUPATIONAL DESISE RESULTING FROM WORK PLACE EXPOSURES etc.
Adjudicators insisted on denying my "Vitiligo" claim despite Dermatologist's
(Doctor from Hospital's Occupational Health Clinic) LETTER CLEARLI
/DEFINITELY DIAGNOSING THIS CONDITION AS OCCUPATIONAL and despite provided
by me Literature and other doctors diagnoses.
*WSiB includes some Record / "my" Application to WSiB which apparently I
forwarded many years ago and which WSiB with valor denied, while truths
are that cited Application was pro- actively processed and forwards by Union
at the work place during STRIKE period while Company started to ship
production out to Long Beach - California.
I never was out of work because of alleged "claimed disability" -"A HEARING
LOSS" and I did not precede ON MY OWN with that Application at any point in
time. THAT IS THE REASON, WHY MY APLICATION WAS CLOUSED NOT DENIED!
* WSiB CLAIMS THAT I DID NOT HAVE DOCTOR's / MEDICAL EXAMS DURING 2004 -
My irregular examinations during 2004-2005 years were results of number of
*I did not have a family Doctor after I moved from one CITY to another
*I was very sick and I could not get around in order to get new Physician
(no Doctor wanted to take a new and sick patient).
*Contacted Doctors did not want to talk about work relations with my medical
problems. Wanted to treat me for imaginary conditions while deteriorating my
*I did not have any means of transportation nor any resources to help my
self while suffering depression, Parkinsonism and very many other very
horrifying physical/neurological (impaired) problems and list can go on..:).
Dear Sir, please PREVENT Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti
LLP) and Ms. K. Koss (Apotex) on Criminal Grounds of Inadmissibility /
committing acts which constitute the essential elements of a crime involving
moral turpitude ( FROUD, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY AND MANY MORE) , from
participation in WSIAT's adjudicative process. An attempt or conspiracy to
commit such a crime is included in this ground. They committed/ committing
acts which constitute the essential elements of a violation or conspiracy to
violate many laws / regulations in Canada.
The convictions arose not from a single trial or arose from a single scheme
of conduct involving moral turpitude but from years long PATERN OF
Those individuals engaged in criminal activities on behalf of Criminal
Corporation FOR MANY YEARS AND THEY MUST BE STOPED!
I know /have reason to believe that those individuals are known assisters,
abettors, conspirators, colluders with others in the illicit acts to
torture, discriminate, denie medical help to me / a disabled person.
It is submitted , that Apotex / Counsel, Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely
Thorup Angeletti LLP) as well as Ms. K. Koss (Apotex) should be prevented
from abuse and obstruction of WSIAT's adjudicative process and from making
any frivolous, vexatious , trivial , made in bad faith suggestions with out
any merit / scientific / legal bases further tormenting/ torturing me /a
victim. Thos individuals should be charged with Contempt of WSIAT and all
other Administrative Boards, Commissions, Tribunals processes etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koss
(Apotex) falsified all records provided by them to all Government Agencies
and engaged others / employees in criminal conspiracy (documented) which
untimely further deteriorated(s) my state of health.
Those individuals purposely are omitting very critical evidence and medical
conditions (or are reducing it in to insignificance).
For many years those individuals were committing crimes against me / a
victim by falsifying/ concealing evidence / Documents, soliciting criminal
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koss
(Apotex) got engaged in intentional malicious conduct on behalf of Criminal
Corporation violating all statutes with a reckless indifference. They acted
in the face of a perceived risk that their actions will violate all laws,
torture and destroy / kill suffering, sick person.
They perpetuated TORTURE, TORMENT, RETRIBUTION, DISCRIMINATION and
Mr. Carl Peterson, (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koss did
knowingly and willfully make a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent
statements and representation in a matter within the jurisdiction of the
Ontario Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and
other Government Agencies, in the process DENIED MEDICAL HELP as well as
obstructed Canadian Constitution, Legal System etc.
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. Koss
committed many counts of perverting the course of justice or intending to
pervert the course of justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy,
criminal negligence, criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted
murder, did contribute to my permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Issues and/or events which occurred after my departure from Employer are
also in full are Apotex's (Mr. Peterson's -Company's Counsel and Ms. Koss as
accomplices /executors ) liabilities due to fact that those individuals on
behalf of Apotex actively sabotaged legal /administrative proceedings in all
Government Agencies in question. Preliminary matters are that Mr. Peterson
(Company's Counsel) and Ms. Koss (Apotex) in premeditated manner are
torturing me for MANY, MANY years and pending. They / Company /accomplices
act without any consideration for the human rights and my well being despite
their awareness of my situation and familiarity with my File.
Apotex is defiant, not regretful, with out remorse, not willing to correct
Mr. Carl Peterson,(Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) and Ms. K. Koss
(Apotex) falsified or concealed all records provided by them to Ontario
Labor Board, WSiB, Ontario Human Rights Commission, Tribunal and other
Government Agencies (collectively Government) and engaged other people in
criminal conspiracy (documented) which untimely further deteriorates my
state of health. On behalf of Company they committed many counts of
perverting the course of justice or intending to pervert the course of
justice, many counts of perjury, criminal conspiracy, criminal negligence,
criminal recruitment of false witnesses, attempted murder, did contribute to
permanent disability, irreparable damage.
Those individuals got involved in my Case, purposely were omitting
/altering very critical evidence and medical conditions (or were reducing it
in to insignificance) and were paid for it while limiting my professional
and personal life, making challenging my social life, destroyed my marriage,
imposed extreme hardship on my family and relatives/friends and in vicious /
malicious manner on on going bases are preventing me from enjoying my
Constitutional Right to obtain medical help, be able to provide for myself
In near future I may select to proceed with CIVIL/ CRIMINAL/ LEGAL ACTIOMN
AGAINST Mr. Carl Peterson , his Firm (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP)
and Ms. K. Koss (Apotex).
Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP):
*Despite his OATH TO HER MAJESTY "JUSTICE" TO SERVE LOYALLY, JUSTIFETLY
THOSE IN NEED /JUSTICE SYSTEM, unfortunately he selected to utilize his
knowledge / expertise in criminal, amoral, unprincipled manner. He explored
/utilized gross deficiencies of the Regulatory System and acted against very
sick /disadvantaged / UNREPRESENTED ex-employee of criminal Corporation
contributing great deal to my suffer and to my misery for many, many years.
* Mr. Carl Peterson WITH OUT HASITATION COLLECTED HIS HIGH SALLARY, WHILE
FOR YEARS DESTROYING SICK / SUFFERING PERSON NOT ABLE TO AFORD MEDICATION ,
GROCERIES AND ANY THING ELSE AND SPENDING YEARS BEING BEDRIDDEN IN
*He could not restrain his bad impulses.
*He prevented me from access to Lawyers, to the legal system, to justice!
*Mr. Carl Peterson did every thing in his capacity to make me unsuccessful
in my drive for help and justice despite his awareness of my medical
conditions / personal situation and the evidence conforming my allegations.
*Mr. Carl Peterson directly disrespected me twice in the period of my
struggle while during Mediation process in Labour Board he abandoned the
proceedings and left the Conference Room with out saying any thing (out of
the blue he got up and left the proceedings).
*The same behaviour he demonstrated second time around during Mediation at
Human Rights Commission living Room with out saying a world (out of the blue
he got up and left the proceedings).
*Mr. Carl Peterson wants to participate in judicial process conducted by
WSIAT but he is not in position to make any decisions nor he has any
authorisations to act on behalf of the Company to mediate any thing ( he
did not forward any documents supporting his powers accept Participation
Authorisation). The same situation was every were else.
*Appears, that Mr. Carl Peterson wants yet again to derail this time around
*This is fundamentally undemocratic and not acceptable!
Legal profession changed very negatively in Canada.
It becomes a business interested in making profit not making judgments based
*Mr. Carl Peterson (Filion Wakely Thorup Angeletti LLP) becomes enabler for
Apotex! He manipulated system/ Government Agencies in order to torture,
torment, deny of all civil/ constitutional rights, medical help to a
disabled person etc.
*"EVERY LAWYER IS GOING TO GO IN TO THE OFFICE TODAY AND COMMIT FROUD"- A
TOP LEGAL SCHOLAR AND EX-BAY STREET LAWYER PHILIP SLAYTON TALKS ABOUT HOW
LAWYERS BECOME GREADY, UNPRINCIPLED ENABLERS OF THE RICH - THE CORRUPTION
OF THIS PROFESSION . "LAWYERS ARE RATS!"
Ms. K. Koss (Apotex):
. Despite numerous letters from WSiB demanding Safety Data from Employer,
Ms. K. Koss for many months stagnated process claiming, that SHE MUST
PREPARE /fabricate THEM (SHE DID SORTE OUT WHAT WAS IN SUPPORT OF MY CLAIM)
and provided selective / bias info.
. Ms. K. Koss obtain "list of products" that I was exposed to (?) from
dysfunctional employee who during his employment created an accident at work
place and he become a victim of it. Later on he become Apotex's "safety"
rep. and a criminally motivated "witness".
. She miss represented herself claiming , that she did on regular bases
meet with me to discuss safety issues and to do some safety quizzes while
the truth are that she started her employment with Apotex 3 (three) years
after I was criminally terminated.
. Ms. K. Koss Provided number of quizzes to WSiB , which she claimed that I
did complete during employment , while in fact all of them were completed by
me in one / first day of my employment in 1997.
. Ms. K. Koss altered my personal / Company's medical records withholding /
canceling all Records indicating my medical problems during my employment
. Ms. K. Koss cancels Company's Record indicating , that I was perfectly
healthy before my employment with Apotex
. She removed Company's Records generated by Health and Safety Clinic
recording fact that I never was issued any mask / protective equipment,
. She counseled record, that Company was under construction during my 6,5
years of employment and all equipment / systems were invalidated/ not
functional and buildings were substantially demolished with piles of debris
constantly present in Manufacturing /Packaging areas during processes.
. She concealed fact that during my employment Company did not have a Nurse
on the stuff NOR OFFICIALY ORGANIZED SAFETY DEPARTMENT.
. Ms. K. Koss CONSEALED FACT , THAT VERY MANY EMPLOYEES SUFERRED DEADLY
MEDICAL PROBLEMS AS RESULT OF / FROM UNPROTECTED EXPOSURES TO VERY POTENT
. She did not disclose that most Apotex's employees from my period of
employment were temporary and are not employed any more.
. She did not admit as Company's Record show, that I worked with out any
management, with out any in process quality control, on night shifts and
that all my allegations are cross referenced by evidence.
. Etc., etc., etc.
*I am asking WSIAT TO PROCESS MY REQUEST OF ALLOVING ME TO PROCIDE WITH
LEGAL/ CIVIL / CRIMINAL ACTION AGAINST APOTEX IF COMPANY REFUSES TO SETTLE
MY CLAIM IN SATISFIING TO ME MANNER.
*I AM ASKING WSIAT TO PROCESS MY REQUEST TO ALLOW ME TO PROCEED IN LEGAL
MANNER AGAINST GOVERNMENT OF ONTARIO AND ANY ONE GUILTY OF CRIMES AGAINST ME
IF I SELECT TO DO SO.
*I AM REQUESTING FROM APOTEX CERTIFIED CONSENT TO PAY ADDITIONAL money
($Cn...:) TO MY FAMILY IN CASE OF MY DEATH, UNCONDITIONALLY / REGARDLESS OF
REASONS /CAUSES of my death, BECAUSE ON ANY CIRCUMSTANCE DIRECTLY /
INDDIRECTLY MY DEATH WOULD / will BE RESULTING FROM MY MEDICAL CONDITIONS /
DUE TO WORK RELATED UNPROTECTED EXPOSURES TO advanced structural composite
materials /chemicals used in the manufacturing processes which have been
classified as to have a co- carcinogenic and/or synergistic effect and which
overwhelmed my system. As result of Company's negligence (unprotected
exposure to a potent immunosuppressant, brain function controlling drugs
(psychiatric), antidepressants, narcotics, blood pressure /composition
controlling drugs which overwhelmed my system- I AM DISABLED). Experts
agree that most cancers are caused by our bodies or parts of them being
exposed to certain substances over long periods of time. These cancer
causing substances are called carcinogens.
(NHS 2001). Chemical carcinogens
The chemical agents of cancer have become entrenched in our world in two
ways: first, and ironically, through man's search for a better and easier
way of life; second, because the manufacture and sale of such chemicals has
become an accepted part of our economy and our way of life.
The main source of human exposures to carcinogens today is man-made chemical
compounds. By 1985 it could be stated as a fact that 'nearly all of the
synthetic [man-made] chemicals regularly used in industry today did not
exist 40 years ago [in the 1940s]. Of the 45,000 toxic chemicals listed by
the US National Institute of Safety and Health (NIOSH) in 1980, 2,500 were
identified as carcinogens, 2,700 as mutagens [causing genetic change] and
300 as teratogens [causing malformation of an embryo]. Less than 7,000 had
been adequately tested.
This is old, not new knowledge. Yet it was only during the last 15 years of
the 20th century that medical science began to associate the unprecedented
growth rates of many diseases with modern chemicals. While in the same
15-year period some chemical compounds were banned or reduced (in number and
use) through tighter regulations, man-made chemicals continued to be
developed and marketed in an ever-widening range of products and
applications. The universal application of man-made chemicals in every
sphere of modern life has made exposure to them an unavoidable, lifelong
reality for each one of us. The vast majority of industrial chemicals have
never been tested for their potential to cause or promote cancer.
Synthetic chemicals are in some cases proven to harm - and in other cases
suspected of being harmful - to human health for a range of reasons:
. the majority are based on carbon, and for this reason, are particularly
dangerous to us because being based on carbon, the chemistry of all life,
they readily enter human tissues and seriously disrupt the body's complex
processes and complex chemical reactions.
(Harte et al 'Toxics A-Z' 1991)
. many of those which have been tested are known or suspected carcinogens
. increasing numbers are found to disrupt the function of the endocrine
(hormone) system. This group has particular significance for hormone-related
cancers such as breast cancer
. some are both carcinogenic and hormone-disruptive e.g. atrazine, an
agricultural pesticide widely used in the UK
. the increasing numbers found to 'persist' (remain a long time in the
environment) as a result of being designed to be 'stable compounds' which
are therefore not broken down in the environment by micro-organisms and in
the human body by metabolic processes
. the increasing numbers found to be 'bioaccumulative' (build-up in the
body, mostly in fatty tissue). Chemical compounds that accumulate in living
tissues increase in number and concentration as they move up through the
food chain. It follows therefore, that humans, at the top of the food chain,
will have the highest concentrations
. the capacity of many to cross the blood-brain and placental barriers
. the increased risk of toxicity resulting from the combined effects of
synthetic chemicals on the body.
'adverse effects observable in the pattern of human disease, both in foetal
malformations and the increase in the incidence of cancer - particularly in
young people - and we can observe that those changes have taken place over
the same period of time as the introduction of these novel chemicals.'
Several hundred chemicals are found in a wide range of commercial products
and conditions we unknowingly encounter in our daily lives. Often overlooked
by regulators is the variation in effects on a population from similar
exposures, as recorded by biochemist and cancer researcher Ross Hume Hall:
'Individuals vary greatly in their susceptibility to toxic chemicals, and
the differences between men and women can be punishingly large . Women thus
can fall victim to legal limits of residues of pesticides and waste
chemicals in their supermarket grapes or in their apple juice. Even at their
best, EPA [Environmental Protection Agency, USA] regulations disregard the
susceptibility to cancer of 50 per cent of the population.'
(The Ecologist 1998)
Assured by periodic statements from government and industry about the safety
of regulated chemicals, and lacking the information to challenge such
assurances, most of us are quite unaware that: 'little has been done to
prevent exposure to carcinogenic chemicals in the environment, despite ample
evidence that chemical pollution of our air, water, food and the workplace
is the major cause of cancer.'
Lately, my many medical conditions deteriorated and impose on me a lot of
difficulties and enormous stress.
During my employment and after I developed array of many very serious
medical conditions amongst lungs problem (due to product side effects-
reported to Superiors and documented). My autonomic function of lungs (a
function of the respiratory cycles) has been compromised.
More and more frequently I am stopping to breathe with out a warning. These
are relatively short in duration episodes but I am not in control of them.
Despite my conscious mind I struggle in-vein to take air and I can not make
my lungs to move. I suspect that my neurons / neurotransmitters are affected
/ damaged (altered function / communication) by active ingredients at work.
As result of all my medical conditions I fear, that such undertaking as a
trip for a hearing may end up for me fatally. For very long time I do not go
any where at all (I am bedridden).
I scrolled trough Tribunal's website and I discovered, that Tribunal's extra
ordinary powers do allow Tribunal to make its own rules of proceedings which
allow performing Hearings in any way where appropriate ( "any part of a
proceeding may be conducted in person or by way of a written hearing or
electronically). The Tribunal may exercise any of its powers under these
Rules on its own initiative or at the request of a party as well the
Tribunal may waive or vary the application of any of these Rules where
Due to my circumstance, written format would be the best for me.
"Powers of Practice and Procedure 126.96.36.199 Choosing the Method of Resolution
The ARO, in consultation with the parties, will determine whether to proceed
submissions (also called a "non-appearance hearing") or by an oral hearing.
The Board seems to prefer non-appearance hearings.
AROs will generally discourage oral hearings."
Respondent's all alleged "preliminary" issues do not stand up to my
conformed allegations and due to fact that I did forward all evidence
challenging alleged issues as well as due to fact, that Respondent admitted
all my allegations I am asking Tribunal, whether it is absolutely necessary
for me to attend in person the hearing on Respondent's issues which are not
valid and serve Respondent as a tool to challenge my Application on
I am asking Tribunal to explore / implement alternative method of proceeding
(if possible) to allow me some physical and emotional relief and conclude my
Application in favorable for me manner.
Due to fact, that I do not have any legal representation and due to fact
that Apotex subjected me to the most horrifying experiences imaginable -
Company criminally concealed names/ nature of processed products. Company
processed products with out regulatory permits in Facility not approved for
those products (not providing any personal protection for Personnel), did
not post Safety Data Shits , Work Orders and did not disclose short and long
term health hazards do to massive unprotected exposures) and ever since it
denied me medical help, I was /am under influence / heavily impaired on
psychiatric / antidepressants, narcotics and other very potent medications
(conditions may not be reversible and may last a life time ) I will not be
able to effectively / aggressively defend my self in articulated manner due
to medical condition (severely reduced motor skills, abnormal vision, my
brain feels as if it's "swimming inside of my skull, significantly
compromised speech mechanism, frequent thought blockages, memory
disturbances and many more of other serious neurological problems. I can not
comprehend / rationalize almost any thing on the spot. It takes long time
for me to " get it"
CIVIL LIABILITY ARISING FROM BAD FAITH
The concept of bad faith
"Bad faith" also has not been given a precise definition by the Canadian
courts. However, it has been frequently associated with actions involving
malice, fraud, collusion, illegal conduct, dishonesty, abuse of power,
discrimination, unreasonable conduct, ill-motivated conduct or procedural
Justice Southin in the case of MacMillan Bloedel Ltd. v. Galiano Island
Trust Committee3 articulated the concept of bad faith as follows:
The words bad faith have been used in municipal and administrative case law
to cover a wide range of conduct in the exercise of legislatively delegated
authority. Bad faith has been held to include dishonesty, fraud, bias,
conflict of interest, discrimination, abuse of power, corruption,
oppression, unfairness, and conduct that is unreasonable. The words have
also been held to include conduct based on an improper motive, or undertaken
for an improper, indirect or ulterior purpose. In all these senses, bad
faith describes the exercise of delegated authority that is illegal, and
renders the consequential act void. And in all these senses bad faith must
be proven by evidence of illegal conduct, adequate to support the finding of
*Complaints Against the Government of Ontario
Complaints against the Government of Ontario should name the respondents as
Her Majesty the Queen, in right of Ontario, as represented by the
Minister of ________ and (any personal respondents).
. The Government Ministry representing the Crown should be described in the
particulars of the complaint, but the complaint should cite the Minister, by
title (not by his or her personal name, e.g., Sally Martin) and should not
cite the Ministry. In rare cases, where the Minister himself or herself is
alleged to have directly been involved in the discrimination (e.g., a claim
of sexual harassment) he or she can be named personally.
. The Complaint against the Provincial Crown will be served on the director
of the Legal Services Branch of the Ministry in question.
. The Deputy Minister should not be named as a personal respondent unless he
or she had involvement in the circumstances surrounding the allegations in
the complaint and would otherwise be named as a personal respondent in
keeping with Commission practice.
I POST SOME QUOTES FROM WSiB's MEMOS. I begged Apotex - Employer / WSiB to release name of a product which caused explosion and subsequent fire and which directly affected me in very dramatic way so I could get some help and stop rapid and very horrifying deterioration of my health, but I was refused any consideration! PRODUCTION CONFIDENTIALITY ISSUES!
Apotex's /WSiB's victim
Ron McArthur - Apotex’s Senior Vice President
During news media interview (2002 ) Apotex’s Senior Vice President , Operations Ron McArthur offered a very liberal description / assessment of internal situation / non compliance as a Standard Operational Procedure ( SOP ) WITH IN THIS Organization ( Apotex ) which by its nature invalidated all Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP). All ingredients (actives, controlled substances and every thing else together on the floors in manufacturing (MFG) / Packaging (PKG) areas / all over.
Apotex for years sacrificed own employees AND FOR MANY YEARS very negatively impacted unfortunate, afflicted, and very much suffering vulnerable people / health products consumers.
Scores of them were pushed over the edge by contamination, over dose (luck of actives) etc.
Justice was not served for those affected those who perished in agony / their families / General Public (somebody’s loved ones) often spending last pennies on meds which suppose to help.
Construction / expansion created mayhem for 6 + years.
Ron McArthur actually provided some real matrix / matrices.